Periods of organisational change are often when quality systems are most exposed. Drawing on decades of experience supporting regulatory inspections, this article explores what GxP regulators actually look for when organisations are in flux, whether that change involves new facilities, system migrations, or transitions from paper to electronic records. It examines why regulators expect instability, not perfection, and why the absence of a clear change plan, documented decision-making, and defined authority so often leads to avoidable findings. Using real, anonymised examples from inspections and audits, the article shows how well-managed change can become a quality advantage, providing confidence, traceability, and inspection-ready evidence rather than risk and rework.